Dr Kamal Chhabra, Founder and CEO of KC GlobEd, outlines how syllabus clarity, time planning, and exam technique shape outcomes across ACCA levels
Passing the UK ACCA examinations in 2026 is unlikely to be decided by the number of hours a student studies. Instead, it will be shaped by how clearly candidates understand the structure of the qualification, how deliberately they plan their preparation, and how effectively they apply exam technique across different levels of the syllabus.
According to Dr Kamal Chhabra, Founder and CEO of KC GlobEd, the most consistent shift he observed among ACCA aspirants in recent years has been the growing gap between effort and outcome. While many students commit long study hours, fewer invest enough time in understanding how the ACCA exams are designed to test application, judgement, and prioritisation rather than memory.
The ACCA qualification is structured across three progressive levels: Applied Knowledge, Applied Skills, and Strategic Professional. Each level tests a different dimension of professional readiness. Early papers focus on conceptual grounding, but as candidates move forward, the exams increasingly evaluate decision making, scenario analysis, and commercial awareness. Dr Chhabra notes that candidates who treat all levels with the same preparation mindset often struggle to adapt as expectations change.
In 2025, a recurring pattern among unsuccessful candidates was a lack of syllabus mapping. Many students approached preparation subject by subject without fully understanding how topics are weighted, how questions are framed, or how marks are distributed within each paper. This often resulted in disproportionate effort spent on low-impact areas, while higher-weighted sections received limited attention. For 2026, such misalignment is likely to be costlier, as exams continue to emphasise integration of concepts rather than isolated topic recall.
Time planning has emerged as another defining factor. Candidates who plan preparation only around exam dates tend to compress learning, revision, and practice into the final weeks. Dr Chhabra emphasises that effective preparation requires separating these phases early on. Concept building, question practice, and revision need distinct timelines, with regular checkpoints to assess readiness. Without this structure, even well-prepared students struggle to perform under exam conditions.
Equally critical is familiarity with exam technique. ACCA papers reward clarity, relevance, and professional presentation. Many answers fail not because the candidate lacks knowledge, but because responses do not directly address what the question demands. In scenario-based papers, markers look for applied reasoning, not textbook definitions. Candidates who practise only content consumption without timed question attempts often discover too late that they are unable to structure answers within the allotted time.
Mock tests and self-assessment play a central role in bridging this gap. Dr Chhabra points out that candidates who regularly attempt mocks under exam conditions develop an instinct for pacing, prioritisation, and answer framing. These skills cannot be developed through passive study. Reviewing mock performance, identifying weak areas, and revisiting concepts with intent helps convert effort into measurable improvement.
Another shift observed during the year was the growing importance of maintaining consistency over intensity. Students who followed realistic study schedules, balanced preparation with rest, and avoided burnout tended to perform more reliably than those who relied on last-minute surges. Mental clarity and confidence, especially during professional-level papers, often determine how well candidates interpret complex scenarios and manage pressure.
As the 2026 exam cycle approaches, Dr Chhabra believes that candidates who succeed will be those who treat preparation as a structured process rather than an endurance test. Understanding how the ACCA evaluates competence, planning study phases deliberately, and practising application-driven questions consistently will matter far more than sheer volume of study hours.
The difference between passing and falling short, he notes, increasingly lies in preparation discipline. In a qualification designed to reflect real-world professional judgement, structure has become the decisive advantage.
At Prittle Prattle News, we honor your dedication and inventiveness led by showcasing you in a positive light. Under the direction of Editor-in-Chief Smruti Bhalerao, our platform is committed to disseminating powerful narratives that raise awareness and motivate change. For more important stories, follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube.
1 Comment